Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 2024 Mar 11.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38479699

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare and severe inflammatory skin disease characterised by recurrent or intermittent flares. Epidemiological and disease management data in Spain are limited. Our goal was to estimate the epidemiology of GPP, explore its management, and reach consensus on the current challenges faced in Spain. METHODS: An electronic survey was submitted to dermatologists from the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Psoriasis Working Group. This group is experienced in the management of GPP. It included a Delphi consensus to establish the current challenges. RESULTS: A total of 33 dermatologists responded to the survey. A 5-year prevalence and incidence of 13.05 and 7.01 cases per million inhabitants, respectively, were estimated. According to respondents, the most common GPP symptoms are pustules, erythema, and desquamation, while 45% of patients present > 1 annual flares. A total of 45% of respondents indicated that flares often require a length of stay between 1 and 2 weeks. In the presence of a flare, 67% of respondents often or always prescribe a non-biological systemic treatment as the first-line therapy [cyclosporine (55%); oral retinoid (30%)], and 45% a biological treatment [anti-TNFα (52%); anti-IL-17 (39%)]. The dermatologists agreed that the main challenges are to define and establish specific therapeutic goals to treat the disease including the patients' perspective on the management of the disease. CONCLUSION: Our study describes the current situation on the management of GPP in Spain, increasing the present knowledge on the disease, and highlighting the current challenges faced at the moment.

2.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 2023 Nov 02.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37925068

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare and severe inflammatory skin disease characterised by recurrent or intermittent flares. Epidemiological and disease management data in Spain are limited. Our goal was to estimate the epidemiology of GPP, explore its management, and reach consensus on the current challenges faced in Spain. METHODS: An electronic survey was submitted to dermatologists from the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Psoriasis Working Group. This group is experienced in the management of GPP. It included a Delphi consensus to establish the current challenges. RESULTS: A total of 33 dermatologists responded to the survey. A 5-year prevalence and incidence of 13.05 and 7.01 cases per million inhabitants, respectively, were estimated. According to respondents, the most common GPP symptoms are pustules, erythema, and desquamation, while 45% of patients present > 1 annual flares. A total of 45% of respondents indicated that flares often require a length of stay between 1 and 2 weeks. In the presence of a flare, 67% of respondents often or always prescribe a non-biological systemic treatment as the first-line therapy [cyclosporine (55%); oral retinoid (30%)], and 45% a biological treatment [anti-TNFα (52%); anti-IL-17 (39%)]. The dermatologists agreed that the main challenges are to define and establish specific therapeutic goals to treat the disease including the patients' perspective on the management of the disease. CONCLUSION: Our study describes the current situation on the management of GPP in Spain, increasing the present knowledge on the disease, and highlighting the current challenges faced at the moment.

3.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 106(7): 550-4, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26049964

RESUMO

The first biosimilar version of a biologic agent used to treat psoriasis (infliximab) entered the Spanish market on February 16 of this year, and more biosimilars can be expected to follow in the coming months and years. Logically, this new situation will have economic repercussions and alter prescribing patterns among dermatologists. In this second part of the review, we will look at several somewhat contentious issues, such as the extrapolation of indications, interchangeability, and automatic substitution. We will also review the biosimilars with indications for psoriasis currently in the clinical development pipeline and assess their potential to offer comparable efficacy and safety to the reference product while contributing to the sustainability of the public health care system.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Medicamentos Biossimilares/uso terapêutico , Aprovação de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/economia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/farmacocinética , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Medicamentos Biossimilares/efeitos adversos , Medicamentos Biossimilares/economia , Medicamentos Biossimilares/farmacocinética , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Substituição de Medicamentos , União Europeia , Humanos , Infliximab/efeitos adversos , Infliximab/uso terapêutico , Farmacovigilância , Espanha , Espondilite Anquilosante/tratamento farmacológico , Equivalência Terapêutica
4.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 106(7): 545-9, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25987472

RESUMO

The first biosimilar version of a biologic agent used to treat psoriasis (infliximab) entered the Spanish market on February 16 of this year, and more biosimilars can be expected to follow in the coming months and years. Logically, this new situation will have economic repercussions and alter prescribing patterns among dermatologists. In this article, we review regulatory issues related to the approval of biosimilars, with a particular focus on the situation in the European Union. We will examine analytical characterization studies and special considerations for clinical trials with biosimilars, and also look at several somewhat contentious issues, such as the extrapolation of indications, interchangeability, and automatic substitution. Finally, we will review the biosimilars with indications for psoriasis currently in the clinical development pipeline and assess their potential to offer comparable efficacy and safety to the reference product while contributing to the sustainability of the public health care system.


Assuntos
Medicamentos Biossimilares/uso terapêutico , Aprovação de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Medicamentos Biossimilares/efeitos adversos , Medicamentos Biossimilares/economia , Medicamentos Biossimilares/farmacocinética , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/economia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Composição de Medicamentos , Substituição de Medicamentos , Medicamentos Genéricos/efeitos adversos , Medicamentos Genéricos/economia , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapêutico , União Europeia , Humanos , Infliximab/efeitos adversos , Infliximab/uso terapêutico , Projetos de Pesquisa , Equivalência Terapêutica
5.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 104(8): 694-709, 2013 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24018211

RESUMO

Biologic therapy is a well-established strategy for managing moderate and severe psoriasis. Nevertheless, the high cost of such therapy, the relatively short span of clinical experience with biologics, and the abundance of literature now available on these agents have made evidence-based and consensus-based clinical guidelines necessary. The ideal goal of psoriasis treatment is to achieve complete or nearly complete clearing of lesions and to maintain it over time. Failing that ideal, the goal would be to reduce involvement to localized lesions that can be controlled with topical therapy. Although current evidence allows us to directly or indirectly compare the efficacy or risk of primary or secondary failure of available biologics based on objective outcomes, clinical trial findings cannot be directly translated to routine practice. As a result, the prescribing physician must tailor the treatment regimen to the individual patient. This update of the clinical practice guidelines issued by the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) on biologic therapy for psoriasis incorporates information from the most recent publications on this topic.


Assuntos
Fatores Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Acitretina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Fatores Biológicos/economia , Criança , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Terapia Combinada , Análise Custo-Benefício , Substituição de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Metanálise como Assunto , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Fotoquimioterapia , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Espanha , Falha de Tratamento , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA